Navigating AI Copyright and Ownership Under UAE Law in 2025

MS2017
Who owns AI-generated content? Understanding UAE law and copyright protection for your business.

The United Arab Emirates continues to accelerate its position as a technology-forward global business hub, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing a transformative role across industries such as finance, media, healthcare, and logistics. As organizations in the UAE harness AI to drive innovation, questions arise regarding the copyrightability, ownership, and legal protection of AI-generated works. Against this backdrop, the UAE has undertaken substantial legal reforms, including the Federal Law No. 38 of 2021 on Copyrights and Neighboring Rights, bringing new clarity and challenges to the intersection of AI and intellectual property.

It is crucial for businesses, creative professionals, HR managers, and legal teams operating in the UAE to grasp the nuances of AI-related copyright protection and develop robust compliance strategies. This article delivers a deep, consultancy-grade analysis of UAE copyright law as it relates to AI – addressing recent updates, practical applications, ownership determination, compliance risks, and future outlooks.

Table of Contents

Federal Law No. 38 of 2021: Main Pillars

The foundation of copyright protection in the UAE is Federal Law No. 38 of 2021 on Copyrights and Neighboring Rights (replacing Federal Law No. 7 of 2002), issued by His Highness the President and published in the Federal Official Gazette. Effective since January 2022, this statute aligns domestic standards with international treaties such as the Berne Convention and WIPO Copyright Treaty, reflecting the UAE’s pro-innovation legal vision.

  • Scope of Protection: The Law protects original works of literature, arts, software, and other intellectual creations fixed in tangible form, regardless of value or purpose.
  • Duration: Copyright typically protects works for the life of the author plus 50 years.
  • Subject Matter: The law covers a wide spectrum, including written works, software, databases, audio-visual content, and artistic works.
  • Registration: Registration with the Ministry of Economy is not mandatory for protection but is advisable for enforcement purposes.

Recent Regulatory Guidance (UAE Ministry of Economy, 2023): The Ministry has issued interpretative guidelines clarifying registration procedures for technology-driven works, further highlighting the relevance for AI-generated content.

Legislative Alignment and Updates

The 2021 Law introduced progressive definitions and opened the door to protecting non-traditional outputs, while preserving the requirement for human authorship as a baseline for originality. It sets the framework for AI output assessment but does not yet designate AI systems themselves as ‘authors.’ This omission reflects the position of most major jurisdictions and international conventions.

Copyrightable Works in the AI Context

Classifying AI-Generated Outputs: Where Does the Law Draw the Line?

Under the UAE’s current framework, copyright protection hinges upon originality and fixation—standards tested anew by developments in AI. Two scenarios emerge most frequently:

  1. Human-AI Collaboration: A human initiates, controls, or curates the AI’s output (e.g., providing prompts, refining results). Such works are typically eligible for copyright, with the human regarded as the author.
  2. Fully Autonomous AI Output: An AI system generates creative output independently, based only on training data and algorithms, with little or no human creative input. The legal status of such works is less certain, as the law customarily requires human authorship.

The Ministry of Economy, referencing the Federal Legal Gazette, maintains that while AI tools facilitate creation, the “original intellectual effort” by a human remains a core criterion (MOE, 2023 Guidelines).

What Is Protected?

The law extends copyright protection to:

  • Original text, visual, or audio-visual works (including books, films, artwork, photographs, and software).
  • Databases and compilations, provided the selection or arrangement shows originality.
  • Software code, whether wholly or partially written by AI, subject to originality and human contribution.

Automated content generated by AI alone—such as data analysis outputs, AI-written articles without creative human involvement, or images generated solely by a machine—typically falls outside current protection under UAE law. However, this gray area is increasingly relevant and may evolve with future legislative amendments.

Ownership of AI-Generated Works Under UAE Law

At present, UAE law does not recognize AI as a legal subject. By extension, authorship and resulting copyright can be attributed only to human creators or, in specific cases, legal entities through employment or commissioning. The following principles apply:

  • Human as Author: If a person significantly directs or modifies AI output, they are regarded as the author and rights holder.
  • Employer Ownership: Works created in the scope of employment belong to the employer unless a contract specifies otherwise (Article 14, Federal Law No. 38 of 2021).
  • Commissioned Works: Rights vest per the commissioning agreement, and by default may belong to the commissioning party.
Recommended Visual: Ownership Flow Diagram – ‘AI-Generated Works: Who Owns the Rights?’
Scenario Owner Under UAE Law
AI used as tool with clear human direction (employee creates content using AI for employer) Employer, unless otherwise agreed
Individual uses AI to create content for own use Individual user, as author
AI autonomously generates work (no human authorship) Unclear, typically not protected

Implication for Businesses

Organizations need to update employment contracts, IP policies, and procurement agreements to clarify rights arising from AI-assisted output. Ambiguities around authorship can jeopardize exclusivity, royalty arrangements, and enforceability. It is essential to define, in writing, the extent of human input and ownership transfer in all content and creative output involving AI.

Practical Insights and Real-World Scenarios

Application Scenario 1: Media Company Using Generative AI

Example: A UAE-based media agency uses generative AI to assist employees in drafting advertising copy and creating images. A human editor reviews, modifies, and approves the final content before publication.

  • Legal Position: The human editor’s role satisfies the originality requirement; the agency, as employer, is the copyright owner.
  • Best Practice: Document creative processes, including human modifications to AI output, and retain records for enforcement purposes.

Application Scenario 2: Freelance Developer Employing AI Software

Example: A freelance software developer in Dubai utilizes AI code-completion tools but writes significant portions of code manually. The client commissions the final software product.

  • Legal Position: Provided the developer’s contribution is original, they are the initial owner; rights may transfer to the client per the commissioning or assignment contract.
  • Risk: Omitting clarity regarding AI usage or transfer in contracts can result in ownership disputes or unenforceable claims.

Application Scenario 3: Autonomous AI Art Generator

Example: An AI system trained on public artwork autonomously creates new digital images. No human inputs creative commands or selects final outputs.

  • Legal Position: Absent significant human creative input, the resulting works likely fall outside UAE copyright protection—raising uncertainties for monetization or licensing.
Suggested Visual: Compliance Checklist – Key Steps for Safeguarding AI-Generated IP
Checklist Item Description
Document Human Input Maintain clear records of all human interactions and modifications to AI outputs.
IP Policy Updates Revise internal policies to address AI contributions and employee obligations.
Contract Clauses Include explicit terms on IP ownership, assignment, and AI tool usage.
Register Copyright Where applicable, file voluntary registrations with the UAE Ministry of Economy for enforceability.
Compliance Training Educate staff and contributors on legal risks and permitted AI usage.
  • Unclear Ownership: Disputes may arise between employees, freelancers, and commissioning parties if AI-generated works lack documented human authorship or contract clarity.
  • Copyright Infringement: Use of AI systems trained on third-party works may unintentionally breach copyright if outputs are substantially similar to protected originals.
  • Regulatory Fines: Under the Federal Law No. 38 of 2021, infringement can result in criminal and civil penalties, with fines of up to AED 100,000 and possible imprisonment.
  • Reputational Harm: Organizations may suffer brand and financial damage if found misusing AI-generated works or failing to respect copyright laws.
Visual Suggestion: Penalty Comparison Table – Old vs. New Law
Issue Federal Law No. 7 of 2002 Federal Law No. 38 of 2021
Unlawful Copying Fines up to AED 50,000 Fines up to AED 100,000 + potential imprisonment
Lack of Clear Authorship Ambiguities unresolved Emphasis on human authorship; greater scrutiny on documentation

Compliance Strategies for UAE Organizations

  1. Revise Corporate IP Policies: Ensure all policies reflect updated UAE law and explicitly address AI-created works and employee contributions.
  2. Strengthen Contracts: Update employment, commissioning, and supplier agreements to resolve authorship and ownership of AI-involved outputs.
  3. Conduct AI Due Diligence: Assess AI tool training datasets for potential copyright issues to avoid exposure to claims.
  4. Employee Training: Educate HR, legal, and creative teams about evolving copyright law and AI usage limitations.
  5. Voluntary Copyright Registration: While not mandatory, registering eligible works with the UAE Ministry of Economy supports enforcement in case of disputes.
Visual: Key Differences in Copyright Law – Old vs. New
Provision Federal Law No. 7 of 2002 Federal Law No. 38 of 2021
Explicit Coverage of AI Works Not addressed Recognizes issue; requires human authorship
Penalties for Infringement Lower penalties; vague deterrence Stricter penalties; detailed enforcement tools
Alignment with International Treaties Basic alignment Updated for WIPO, Berne Convention, WTO TRIPS compliance
Voluntary Registration Process Manual process, less clarity Streamlined, digital registration encouraged by Ministry of Economy
Emphasis on Documentation Limited focus Clear emphasis—documentation required for AI-human collaborations
  • International Development: Globally, jurisdictions are revisiting the treatment of AI-generated works, with some proposing sui generis (unique) rights or database protections for non-traditional creations.
  • UAE Policy Direction: The UAE has signaled ongoing reviews of how technology, innovation, and intellectual property protections interact, with more detailed guidelines or amendments anticipated in the coming years.
  • Increased Enforcement: Regulators are likely to heighten scrutiny on AI-origin content, especially where ownership or provenance disputes impact businesses or the creative industries.

Best Practice Recommendations

  1. Map IP Risks Regularly: Integrate AI copyright reviews into organizational risk audits and internal compliance programs.
  2. Engage Legal Counsel: Seek informed legal guidance on complex authorship, assignment, and enforcement issues where AI or emerging technologies are involved.
  3. Adopt IP Management Tools: Invest in systems or platforms that track creation, modification, and ownership of digital works involving AI.
  4. Participate in Policy Development: Monitor notices from the UAE Ministry of Economy, Ministry of Justice, and Federal Gazette for guidance and contribute feedback on policy consultations.

The integration of artificial intelligence into the creative and commercial sectors has redefined the boundaries of copyright law in the UAE. Federal Law No. 38 of 2021, together with Ministry-issued guidance, provides a robust framework for protecting the rights of human creators while addressing—but not fully resolving—the challenges of AI autonomy. Critical for organizations is the implementation of clear, proactive policies and contractual frameworks that identify and document human input in AI-augmented processes.

Future legislative refinements are expected to clarify the standing of fully autonomous AI-generated works, with ongoing dialogue at the national and international levels. To remain compliant and competitive—particularly in anticipation of potential 2025 regulatory updates—businesses must stay informed, invest in legal expertise, and pursue best practices in intellectual property management. By doing so, organizations can safeguard their assets, foster innovation, and support the UAE’s vision of becoming a global leader in digital transformation and creative industries.

Share This Article
Leave a comment